Allowed

Beauty Bonia Konwar @ Beauty Konwar and 2 Ors. v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC16 Aug 2023AB/2055/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the Gauhati High Court made absolute the interim pre-arrest bail previously granted to the petitioners in an FIR related to cheating and criminal conspiracy, subject to standard cooperation conditions.

What did the court decide?

The interim pre-arrest bail granted on 28.06.2023 is made absolute subject to conditions of cooperation, non-inducement, and non-tampering.

Beauty Bonia Konwar @ Beauty Konwar and 2 Ors. Vs the… — Anticipatory Bail | Gauhati HC (2023)

¶1

Page No.# 1/3

¶2

GAHC010126052023

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : AB/2055/2023

¶5

BEAUTY BONIA KONWAR @ BEAUTY KONWAR AND 2 ORS W/O SHRI BOLIN KONWAR, PERMANENT R/O BAPU BHETI GAON, P.S. THELAMARA, P.O. GHOTUA, PIN-784149, DIST. SONITPUR

¶6

2: SMTI. GEETANJALI KONWAR D/O SHRI BOLIN KONWAR PERMANENT R/O BAPU BHETI GAON

¶7

P.O. GHOTUA

¶8

PIN-784149 DIST. SONITPUR

¶9

3: SHRI DHARMESHWAR @DHARMENDRA KONWAR S/O SHRI BOLIN KONWAR PERMANENT R/O BAPU BHETI GAON

¶10

P.S. THELAMARA P.O. GHOTUA PIN-784149 DIST. SONITPU VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE LD. PP, ASSAM

¶11

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A BHATTACHARYA

¶12

Page No.# 2/3

¶13

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM

¶14

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR

¶15

ORDER

¶16

Date : 16.08.2023

¶17

Heard Mr. A Bhattacharya, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B Sarma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent.

¶18

By this petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioners, namely, 1. Beauty Bonia Konwar @ Beauty Konwar, Geetanjali Konwar and 3. Dharmeshwar @ Dharmendra Konwar have prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Nalbari P.S. Case No. 244/2023 u/ss 120B/420/313/498A of the IPC r/w Section 4 of the D.P.Act.

¶19

The Case diary, as called for, is placed before the Court.

¶20

It may be mentioned that by order, dated 28.06.2023, this Court granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.

¶21

Mr. B Sarma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, submits that the case diary shows that the petitioners have appeared before the investigating officer and got their statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. as per the interim pre arrest bail granted earlier. There is no adverse report against the petitioners from the I.O.

¶22

Therefore, the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order, dated 28.06.2023 is hereby made absolute, subject to the following conditions-

¶23

(i) That the petitioners shall co-operate in investigation as and when required;

¶24

(ii) That the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and

¶25

(iii) That the petitioners shall not hamper or tamper with the investigation in any manner.

¶26

Return the case diary.

¶27

Page No.# 3/3

¶28

This disposes of the anticipatory bail application.

¶29

JUDGE

¶30

Comparing Assistant

Beauty Bonia Konwar @ Beauty Konwar and 2 Ors. v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Beauty Bonia Konwar @ Beauty Konwar and 2 Ors. v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Mridul Ali Vs the State of Assam

Abu Taher Vs the State of Assam

Pankaj Kumar Nagbanshi @ Pankaj Kr. Nagbanshi Vs the State of Assam

Babita Deka Vs the State of Assam

Hafijur Rahman @ Hafijul Rahman Vs the State of Assam

Amir Ali Vs the Union of India