The Gauhati High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application and directed the petitioner to appear before the subordinate court within 10 days to seek regular bail if advised by counsel.
Application dismissed; direction to petitioners appearance before lower court within ten days for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010075512023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1310/2023
BABITA DEKA
W/O HITESH DEKA, R/O VILL-ADHAMAPARA, P.O.-CHAPAI, P.S.MANGALDAI, DIST-DARRANG, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M HOQUE
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
ORDER
Date : 16.08.2023
Heard Mr. M Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B Sharma, learned Addl. P.P., Assam.
It is submitted by Mr. B Sharma, learned Addl. P.P., Assam that charge-sheet has been submitted in the case vide C.S. No. 301/23, dated 26.07.2023 in connection with Mangaldai P.S. Case No. 01/2023.
Page No.# 2/2
In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application stands dismissed with a direction to the petitioner to appear before the learned Court below within 10(Ten) days and seek regular bail, if so advised. If such bail application is filed, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law.
This disposes of the anticipatory bail application.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be allowed.
Whether the petitioner is directed to seek regular bail.
BABITA DEKA
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
AJIT BORTHAKUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
