Petitioner sought pre-arrest bail in a criminal case. Counsel for the petitioner requested withdrawal of the application. The court allowed the prayer, dismissing the application on withdrawal with no objection from the State.
Pre-arrest bail application withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010078142023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1412/2023
JIA UDDIN S/O LATE BADRUL HOQUE R/O VILL- BAGHAN P.S. BAZARICHERA DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM
VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J LASKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
ORDER
16-06-2023
Heard Mr. J. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State.
By this application under Section 438 CrPC, the petitioner, namely, Jia Uddin apprehending his arrest is seeking pre arrest bail in Bazarichera P.S. Case
Page No.# 2/2
No. 43/202023 registered under Section 120(B)/418/420/379/411 IPC corresponding to G.R. No.460/2023.
On instruction of the petitioner, Mr. Laskar, learned counsel prays for withdrawal of this pre arrest bail application, to which Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam has no objection.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this pre-arrest bail application stands dismissed on withdrawal.
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jia Uddin
State of Assam
Manash Ranjan Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
