Premush Daimary v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed writ petition for delayed payment of ₹15.97 lakhs as matter disposed in accord with prior order dated 17.12.2021 in WP(C) No. 6482/2021.
Court dismissed writ petition for delayed payment of ₹15.97 lakhs as matter disposed in accord with prior order dated 17.12.2021 in WP(C) No. 6482/2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010221002021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/7327/2021
PREMUSH DAIMARY
S/O-ROBIN DAIMARY, R/O- VILLAGE BORO SLANGI, P.O- AMTEKA BAZAR, DISTRICT- CHIRANG, BTR,
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06
2:THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ASSAM JURIPAR
PANJABARI GUWAHATI-37
3:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL REGION REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
BTC
P.O AND DIST- KOKRAJHAR
4:THE SECRETARY PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BTC KOKRAJHAR
P.O AND DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR
Page No.# 2/3
ASSAM
5:THE DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BTC KOKRAJHAR P.O AND DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM
6:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SIDLI- CHIRANG DEVELOMENT BLOCK
BTC SIDLI DIST- CHIRANG ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R DHAR
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D.
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
03-01-2022
Heard Mr. B.C.Muchahary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing counsel, P&RD Department for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Also heard Mr. R. K. Muchahary, learned Standing counsel, BTC for the respondent Nos. 3 to 6.
The Block Development Officer, Sidli-Chirang Development Block, respondent No. 6 has issued a Completion Certificate stating that the petitioner has already completed the work of “Erosion Protection of Lankar River at Ananda Village near Jitnal Basumatary Paddy Field under SOPD Fund for the year 2018-19” (Annexure-5 to this petition).
It is stated by the petitioner that an admitted amount of Rs. 15,97,000/- is payable to him for completion of the aforesaid construction work. Inspite of his best effort, the respondent authorities did not pay him the said admitted amount. Hence, this writ petition.
Learned counsels for the parties submitted at the bar that this case is covered by the order
Page No.# 3/3
dated 17.12.2021 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 6482/2021.
In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 17.12.2021 passed in WP(C) No. 6482/2021.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Premush Daimary
The State of Assam
The Commissioner
The Bodoland Territorial Region
The Secretary Panchayt and Rural Development BTC Kokrajhar
Manash Ranjan Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court