A writ petition was dismissed as it was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel upon instruction. No substantive legal principle was articulated or disposition of merit considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010131402013
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5148/2013
REHANA BEGUM LASKAR
W/O SAMSUL HAQUE LASKAR, R/O SONABARIGHAT PART-I, P.O. SONAPUR, P.S. SILCHAR, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ULUBARI GHY-7 ASSAM 3:THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL SOUTHERN ZONE PARK ROAD SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM
4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CACHAR P.O. and P.S. SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM
5:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE SILCHAR P.S. P.O. and P.S. SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR
Page No.# 2/2
ASSAM
6:SAMIR UDDIN MAZUMDER S/O LT. YASIN MAZUMDER VILL. KANAKPUR PT-I SONAI ROAD P.O. and P.S. SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN-78800
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.S F MAITAI
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
05/01/2022
Heard Mr. J U N M Laskar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. D Das, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M Barman, learned Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent Nos. 1 to 5.
On instructions of the petitioner, Mr. Laskar, learned counsel is not pressing this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Rehana Begum Laskar
Samir Uddin Mazumder
Manash Ranjan Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
