Petitioner instructed counsel that the writ petition is now infructuous; the court closed the writ petition accordingly.
The writ petition stands closed having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010044832021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/507/2021
PARESH SARMA S/O LATE PURANDAR SARMA RESIDENT OF QUARTER NO. 20 IRRIGATION COLONY CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 3 KAMRUP M ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 3 3:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER
IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 3 4:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER
ZONE I
Page No.# 2/2
IRRIGATION BARPETA ASSAM 781301 -----------Advocate for : DR. B AHMED Advocate for : SC IRRIGATION appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 10.06.2022
Upon instruction, Mr. A.K. Azad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Mr. N. Upadhyay, learned standing counsel for the Irrigation Department is present.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed having been rendered infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Paresh Sarma
State of Assam
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
