Contempt petition by petitioners to quash the order dated 06.06.2022 granting further time to State respondents, as time has not expired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC030000102022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/3/2022
Smt. A. Vanlalzawni and Anr. Vaivakawn Aizawl, Mizoram
VERSUS
Dr. Renu Sharma and 4 Ors Aizawl, Mizoram
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr A.R. Malhotra
Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte Addl.AG, Mizoram for R2 and R3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
ORDER
09.09.2022
Mr. A.R. Malhotra, learned counsel appears for the petitioners while Ms. Mary L. Khiangte, learned Government Advocate appears for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
Mr. A.R. Malhotra, learned counsel submits that vide Order dated 06.06.2022 passed in IA(C) No. 67/2022, further six months time was granted to the State respondents to comply with the Order dated 27.09.2021 passed in WP(C) No. 89/2021 and since the time granted has not expired, the petitioners would not like to press the
Page No.# 2/2
instant contempt petition at this stage.
In view of above, the contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Smt. A. Vanlalzawni and Anr.
Dr. Renu Sharma and 4 Ors
NELSON SAILO
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
