The Gauhati High Court dismissed an application seeking withdrawal of an anticipatory bail petition. The court disposed of the application as withdrawn following counsel's submission that the underlying FIR had been quashed.
Anticipatory Bail application No. 68 of 2022 disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040006662022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : AB 68/2022
1:Nabam Kojum S/o Late Nabam Tamang,
A Residence of Rugo Village, PO/PS Sagalee, District Papum Pare, Aruanchal Pradesh.
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP Through Public Prosecutor
Advocate for the Petitioner : Taba Topu
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG
ORDER
Date : 19-07-2022
Heard Mr. Taba Topu, learned counsel for the petitioner who prays that he would like to withdraw the Anticipatory Bail application since the FIR against the petitioner has been quashed by the Court.
Mr. U. Bori, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State is present.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Anticipatory Bail
application stands disposed as withdrawn and AB No.68 of 2022 stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application should be disposed of when the petitioner seeks withdrawal due to quashing of the FIR.
Nabam Kojum
The State of Assam
Marli Vankung
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
