The anticipated order indicates the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application by the applicant after the trial had initiated, resulting in the application being closed by the court on 04.08.2022. During the hearing, the trial had already initiated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010093622022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1331/2022
KAMAL ALI
S/O FAZAR ALI, VILL-BARPATHAR, P.S.-DHALIGAON, DIST-CHIRANG, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M H AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
04.08.2022
Shri MH Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the meantime, the trial has initiated and he has already appeared.
Page No.# 2/2
In that view of the matter, the instant anticipatory bail application is closed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Kamal Ali
The State of Assam Represented By The Public Prosecutor, Assam
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
