Yura Tachik v. Yura Yame @ Mai
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Article 226 alleging non-disclosure of cause of action was dismissed on withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh suit.
What did the court decide?
Leave granted to withdraw the petition. Petition dismissed on withdrawal with liberty.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040011092021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 387/2021
1:Yura Tachik
H/o SmtI Yura Yame @ Mai,
Permanent Resident of Village Lodokore, PO/ Tali, PS. Sangram, District Kra Daadi and Presently Residing at Niya Colony, Itanagar, PO/PS. Itanagar, District Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh.
Mob No. 9402222432
VERSUS
1:Yura Yame @ Mai W/o Shri Yura Tachik,
Permanent resident of Village Lodokore, P.O Tali, PS. Sangram, District Kra Daadi and Presently residing at Niya Colony, Itanagar, PO/PS. Itanagar, District Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Neelam Taje
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Yura Tach
- respondent
Yura Yame @ Mai
Coram
sanjay kumar medhi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/387/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court