Ramesh Karmakar v. M.S. Mani Vannan, IAS and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought leave to close a contempt petition claiming compliance with the court's direction. The court granted leave and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed due to compliance with the court's direction.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010025352020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/64/2020
RAMESH KARMAKAR
S/O- LATE DEWAN KARMAKAR @ KRISHNA KARMAKAR, VILL 2 NO. PANBARI, P.O- PANBARI BAZAR, P.S- KACHUGAON, DIST- KOKRAJHAR, BTAD, ASSAM, PIN- 783350
VERSUS
M.S. MANI VANNAN, IAS AND ANR
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT, RELIEF AND REHABILITATION BRANCH, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006
2:PARTHA PRATIM MAZUMDAR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOKRAJHAR ASSAM P.O AND P.S- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM PIN- 78337
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M R KHANDAKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAMESH KARMAKAR
- respondent
M.S. MANI VANNAN IAS AND ANR
Coram
PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/64/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court