Interlocutory application dismissed as infructuous due to a connected writ petition being decided on the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010016132021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/208/2021
BHUBANESWAR NATH
S/O. UPENDRA NATH, R/O. VILL. GORAKSHATTARY, P.O. RAMPUR, P.S. MUKALMUA, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY- 6
2:THE STATE SELECTION BOARD
THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN I.E. THE COMMISSIONER and SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM EDUCATION SECONDARY DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM
KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-781019.
4:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS NALBARI DISTRICT CIRCLE
NALBARI ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/2
S/O. DHARMA NARAYAN GOSWAMI R/O. VILL. BARTALA P.O. BARTALA P.S. MUKALMUA PIN-781138 DIST. NALBARI ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K NAIR
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
12-02-2021
Heard Mr. A. Chetry, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner and Mr. S. M. T. Chistie, learned Standing counsel, Secondary Education Department for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Also heard Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5.
In view of the order passed today in the connected WP(C) No. 5034/2017, this interlocutory application being infructuous, stands dismissed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
BHUBANESWAR NATH
THE STATE OF ASSAM
MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
