Dismissed
Niaz Uddin v. Assam Electricity Board and 4 Ors.
Gauhati HCWP(C)/6195/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010198182018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010198182018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010198182018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6195/2018
NIAZ UDDIN
S/O- LATE SAMED ALI, R/O- BISHNUPALLI, WARD NO. 2, MOUZA P.S AND P.O- HOJAI, DIST- HOJAI, ASSAM
VERSUS
ASSAM ELECTRICITY BOARD AND 4 ORS REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BIJULEE BHAWAN, PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY SECRETARY ASSAM ELECTRICITY BOARD BIJULEE BHAVAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI- 03 PIN- 782435
3:THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER ZOO ROAD PIN- 782435 4:THE ASSTT MANAGER HOJAI ELECTRICAL DIVISION-II APDCL HOJAI P.O AND DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 782435
5:M/S MEGHRAJ NANDALAL AGARWAL FARM
Page No.# 2/2
WHICH IS A PROP FIRM OF SRI MEGHRAJ NANDALAL AGARWAL SITUATED AT MAIN ROAD AND A R/O- MAIN ROAD P.O AND P.S- HOJAI DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 78243
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I A TALUKDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, APDCL
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
08-12-2020
Shri I.A. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Niaz Uddin
Assam Electricity Board
State of Assam
The Assam Power Distribution Corporation Limited
The Asstt Manager Hojai Electrical Division-II APDCL
M/s Meghraj Nandalal Agarwal Farm
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court