Ujjal Debnath v. Bodoland Territorial Council and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed on withdrawal urged by petitioner. No substantive legal question addressed.
Writ petition dismissed on withdrawal urged by petitioner. No substantive legal question addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010079672018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2497/2018
UJJAL DEBNATH
S/O- LATE PRAMOD DDEBNATH, R/O- VILL- KHUDRAKATLABARKUCHI, P.O- MILANPUR, DIST- NALBARI, PIN- 781337, ASSAM
VERSUS
BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL, KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM
2:ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER CUM DIRECTOR PHED BTC KOKRAJHAR ASSAM
3:EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHE BAKSA DIVISION MASHALPUR KOKRAJHAR ASSAM
4:ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHE TAMULPUR SUB DIVISION TAMULPUR ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, BTC
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
07-12-2020
Shri S.N. Krishnatraya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the client has instructed to withdraw this writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ujjal Debnath
Bodoland Territorial Council
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court