Budhar Chandra Adhikary v. Shyam Jagannathan and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010220492019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010220492019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010220492019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C) 535/2019
1:BUDHAR CHANDRA ADHIKARY
S/O- LATE BHUPESH CHANDRA ADHIKARY, R/O- RUPNAGAR, H NO. 5, NEAR LP SCHOOL, UMACHARAN BORA PATH, GUWAHATI- 37, DISTKAMRUP (M)
VERSUS
1:SHYAM JAGANNATHAN AND 2 ORS.
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, FINANCE AND TAXATION, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006
2:ANURAG GOEL COMMISSIONER OF TAXES FINANCE(TAXATION) DEPTT KAR BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006
3:SRIMATI ANJURANI BAISHYA ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF TAXES GUWAHATI UNIT D KAR BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI- 78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R SINGHA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
Date : 06-01-2020
Shri R Sinha, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits on instruction that the order in question dated 24.05.2019, passed by this Court in WP(C) No.6167/2018 has been complied with recently and the seniority of the petitioner has been fixed. He further submits that the petitioner has also been given the benefit of promotion.
Shri A Chaliha, the learned counsel for the sole respondent is present.
In view of the aforesaid submission, there is no live cause of action for adjudication in this
petition which is accordingly closed.
JUDGE
Biplab
Comparing Assistant
Budhar Chandra Adhikary
Shyam Jagannathan and 2 Ors.
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court