Sivasagar Municipal Workers Union v. the State of Assam and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner Union complained about non-deposit of Contributory Provident Fund. Respondent stated the fund was deposited during pendency. Based on categorical statement of redressal, writ petition was closed as no live cause for adjudication existed at that date.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was closed as there was no live cause for adjudication after redressal; petitioner advised to approach appropriate forum for existing grievances.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010012512015
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 2484/2015
1:SIVASAGAR MUNICIPAL WORKERS UNION
A UNIT OF ALL ASSAM CIVIC BODIES WORKDERS FEDERATION, SIVASAGAR UNIT, SIVASAGAR, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT SMT. NONDESWARI BURAGOHAIN.
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY- 6.
2:SIVASAGAR MUNICIPAL BOARD SIVASAGAR REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.D SENAPATI
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sivasagar Municipal Workers Union
- respondent
State of Assam
- respondent
Sivasagar Municipal Board
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/2484/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court