The contempt petition was closed as the impugned order had already been complied with, per counsel for the petitioner.
The contempt petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010205212019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C) 500/2019
1:NAGEN CH. DEKA
S/O- LT GANGA RAM DEKA, R/O- VILL.- DALANG, P.O. PANITIMA, P.S.KAMALPUR, DIST- KAMRUP(R), ASSAM, PIN- 799285.
VERSUS
1:SIDHARTH SINGH, I.A.S. AND 2 ORS.
THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, P.H.E. DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.-6.
2:ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPTT. DISPUR GHY.-6.
3:ABDUL ROUF
I.A. AND A.S. THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI- 29
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H TALUKDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A CHOUDHURY
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
Date : 10-01-2020
It is submitted by Ms. D Das, the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order in question has been complied with.
In view of the above, the contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE Biplab
Comparing Assistant
Nagen Ch. Deka
Sidarth Singh, I.A.S. and 2 ORS.
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
