Sankar Das v. Alok Kumar and 8 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt application alleging violation of a previous writ order, the single judge held that the earlier order merely listed the appeal's pendency without mandating salary release. Consequently, the court found no ground for contempt and closed the case.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010060812019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C) 162/2019
1:SANKAR DAS
S/O PARIMAL DAS, R/O- NIZ BORIGOG, P.O-KANIHA, P.S.-RANGIA, DIST.KAMRUP(R), ASSAM-781380
VERSUS
1:ALOK KUMAR AND 8 ORS.
THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-6
2:SAMIR KR. SINHA IAS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE ESTT (A) DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-06
3:SHYAM JAGANNATHAN IAS THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE ESTT (B) DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-06
4:SAYED ISFAQUR RAHMAN ACS THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE ESTT. (B) DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-06
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sankar Das
- respondent
Alok Kumar
- respondent
Samir Kr. Sinha
- respondent
Shyam Jagannathan
- respondent
Sayed Isfaquor Rahman
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/162/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court