Contempt petition allowed to be withdrawn on the submission of the counsel for the petitioner, leaving the matter closed.
Contempt petition allowed to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010107132016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C) 100/2016
1:RAMEN LAHAKAR
S/O. LT. BRINDA NATH LAHAKAR, R/O. BIRUBARI, NIZARAPARA, PASUPATI PATH, P.O. BIRUBARI, DIST. KAMRUP M, ASSAM.
VERSUS
1:HIMANGA KISHORE SARMA and ANR. COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM
2:SRI RATUL BARUAH MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI-
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.M KALITA
Advocate for the Respondent : MRM P GOSWAMIR-2
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
06. 09. 2019
This contempt petition is allowed to be withdrawn on the submission of Mr. A Barua, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Page No.# 2/2
Accordingly, same is closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ramen Lahakar
Himanga Kishore Sarma
Prasanta Kumar Deka
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
