Sunil Industries Ltd. v. M/S. Assam Tailoring and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
An application seeking impleadment of Sunil Industries Ltd as a respondent in a connected writ petition regarding a tender was disposed of. Held, the applicant has been impleaded as Respondent No. 4.
What did the court decide?
Application for impleadment allowed; applicant impleaded as Respondent No. 4.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010212302019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil) 2922/2019
1:SUNIL INDUSTRIES LTD
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI RAMESH KHANNA, D/8 M.I.D.C. PHASE II, MANPADA ROAD, DOMBIVIL EAST DIST. THANE, MAHARASTRA 421203
VERSUS
1:M/S. ASSAM TAILORING AND ANR.
BARPETA, BOKO, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM 781123, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI BIKASH SARMA
2:M/S ALFUL TAILORING KNITTING AND EMBROIDERY JYOTI NAGAR BAMUNIMAIDAM P.S. CHANDMARI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM 781021 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SMTI NIKUNJA RAJKHOW
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D K MISHRA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K N CHOUDHURY
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be impleaded as a respondent in the connected writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sunil Industries Ltd
- respondent
Ms. Assam Tailoring and Anr.
- respondent
Ms. Alful Tailoring Knitting and Embroidery
- other
Union of India
- other
Education Department
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil)/2922/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court