The applicant withdrew an interlocutory application after reaching an amicable settlement with the respondent, evidenced by a signed agreement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010048922018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil) 1439/2018
1:SMT. HIRADA SAIKIA
W/O KUSHESWAR SAIKIA, R/O- C/O ABHILEKH SENAPATI, THAPA BASTI, ANANDAPARA, DULIAJAN, PO/PS. DULIAJAN, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM.
VERSUS
1:KUSHESWAR SAIKIA
S/O LATE GOPAL SAIKIA, R/O- BORAGADHOI GAON, PO/PS. DULIAJAN, DIST. DIBRUGARH- 786602.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : MR C BARUAH
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 11-03-2019
Mr. R.M. Deka, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that the parties to the
proceeding have arrived at an amicable settlement of the dispute by and between them, pursuant whereto an agreement of settlement has also been signed by both the parties.
In view of the above, Mr. Deka submits that he has instruction from his client not to press this application any further.
I have also heard Mr. B. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent, who confirms the aforesaid
Page No.# 2/2
submission made by Mr. Deka.
In view of the above, this interlocutory application stand disposed of as not pressed.
JUDGE Sukhamay
Comparing Assistant
Smt. Hirada Saikia
Kusheswar Saikia
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
