Allowed

Abdul Hasib Ahmed @ Mufti Abdul Hasib v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC10 Jun 2019AB/704/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the Gauhati High Court converted interim anticipatory bail into absolute bail after noting the petitioner's cooperation in investigation and lack of adverse report by the I.O., subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

The interim anticipatory bail granted vide order dated 11.03.2019 is hereby made absolute subject to specific conditions.

Abdul Hasib Ahmed @ Mufti Abdul Hasib Vs the State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Gauhati HC (2019)

¶1

Page No.# 1/2

¶2

GAHC010050742019

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : AB 704/2019

¶5

1:ABDUL HASIB AHMED @ MUFTI ABDUL HASIB S/O MAULANA NURUDDIN AHMED, R/O VILL-DHUTURAMARI, P.S.TAMARHAT, DIST-DHUBRI, ASSAM

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

1:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

¶8

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K HUSSAIN

¶9

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM

¶10

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Date : 10-06-2019

¶13

Heard Mr. A.K. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.

¶14

By this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioner, namely, Abdul Hasib Ahmed @ Mufti Abdul Hasib, has prayed for granting him pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Tamarhat PS Case No. 27/2019 under Sections 420/468/406 of the IPC.

¶15

Case diary, as called for, is placed before the Court.

¶16

Mr. A.K. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is on

¶17

Page No.# 2/2

¶18

interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order, dated 11.03.2019, and that the petitioner appeared before the I.O. and his statement under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C. got recorded.

¶19

On perusal of the case diary, it is noticed that in terms of the conditions of the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order, dated 11.03.2019, the petitioner appeared before the I.O. and got his statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C.. The petitioner is co-operating in the investigation and there is no adverse report against the petitioner from the I.O. The case diary reveals no justifiable reason for custodial interrogation of the petitioner in the interest of further investigation of the case.

¶20

Therefore, the interim anticipatory bail granted in favour of the petitioner, vide order, dated 11.03.2019, is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions (i) that the petitioner shall appear before the I.O. of the case as and when required for the purpose of investigation; (ii) that the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with the investigation in any manner; and (iii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

¶21

Return the case diary.

¶22

With the above directions, the anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶23

JUDGE

¶24

Comparing Assistant

Abdul Hasib Ahmed @ Mufti Abdul Hasib v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Hasib Ahmed @ Mufti Abdul Hasib v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Head Constableb/Ex-S Sarbeswar Rabharetired Vs Sri Bhaskar Jyoti Mahanta, IPS

Pobitra Saikia and and 4 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 6 Ors.

Prabhat Ch. Das and 2 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Subham Jain Vs the State of Assam

Md. Nazir @ Nazir Ahmed Vs the State of Assam

Majaffar Ali @ Mujaffar Ali Vs the State of Assam