Satyaban Talukdar v. the State of Assam and 8 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010023262018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010023262018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010023262018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil) 581/2018 in WP(C) 194/2017
1:SATYABAN TALUKDAR
S/O- LT. HEMCHANDRA TALUKDAR, R/O- PURANBURKA SATRA, P.O. KHUDRA DIMOO RANGIA, DIST- KAMRUP
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS
REP. THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K BARKATAKI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
04.04.2018
The writ petitioner has filed the I.A.(Civil) No.581/2018 for correction of the typographical error in the Court’s order dated 05.01.2018 in the WP(C) No.194/2017.
The learned counsel Mr. S.K. Barkataki submits that the petitioner belongs to the scheduled caste category and is serving as a Senior Assistant. Accordingly it is submitted that the description of the writ petitioner is incorrect in the Court’s order dated 05.01.2018.
In view of above, after hearing Mr. D. Nath, the learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate, Assam, it is made clear that the petitioner belongs to the scheduled caste category and not OBC category and he
Page No.# 2/2
is serving as the Senior Assistant and not as Copyist, under the jurisdiction of the D.C., Kamrup(R). It may be noted that currently the petitioner is serving in the Koya Revenue Circle, under the D.C., Kamrup(R).
With the above order, this rectificatory application stands allowed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Satyan Ban Talukdar
The State of Assam
Hrishikesh Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court