Petitioner's counsel had no instructions as case brief was taken away, resulting in disposal for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010017282016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 3366/2016
1:MOHD. ABDUR RAKWIB LASKAR
S/O GIYASUDDIN AHMED LASKAR RANGIRKHARI, JHOLORGRAM, NEAR MASJID, HOUSE NO. 05, WARD NO. 20, SILCHAR, ASSAM, DIST. CACHAR, PIN - 788005.
VERSUS
1:THE UNION OF INDIA and 2 ORS
REP. BY THE MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION GOVT. OF INDIA, JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110001.
2:NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SILCHAR REP. BY THE DIRECTOR DIST. CACHAR PIN - 788010.
3:REGISTRAR NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SILCHAR DIST. CACHAR PIN - 788010
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.N G KUNDU
Advocate for the Respondent : MR.S P CHOUDHURYR- 2and3
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
02.04.2018
The learned counsel Mr. N.G. Kundu submits that the litigant has taken away the case brief from
Page No.# 2/2
his chamber and therefore he has no instruction to pursue this matter pertaining to the process of recruitment of Technical Officer in the National Institute of Technology (NIT), Silchar.
The learned counsel Mr. A.S. Dhillon appears for the NIT (respondent Nos.2 and 3).
In view of the above submission made by the petitioner’s lawyer, the case is disposed of for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Mohd. Abdur Rakwib Laskar
The Union of India
National Institute of Technology Silchar
Registrar National Institute of Technology Silchar
Hrishikesh Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
