Allowed impleadment of Amarendra Baruah as respondent No.4 in a connected case due to change of incumbent in the Environment and Forest Department.
Impleadment of Amarendra Baruah as respondent No.4 in Cont.Cas(C) No.478/2016 allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010055782017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil) 4067/2017
1:MISS. AKLIMA KHATUN
VERSUS
1:UDAYAN HAZARIKA and 2 ORS.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
07.02.2018
Heard the learned counsel Mr. A. Matin appearing for the applicant. The respondents are represented by the learned counsel Ms. R.B. Bora.
Since there is change of incumbent in the post of Secretary of the Environment and Forest Department, the impleadment of Amarendra Baruah as respondent No.4 in the Cont.Cas(C) No.478/2016 is allowed.
Misc. case is allowed accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Miss. Aklima Khatoon
Udayan Hazarika
Hrishikesh Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
