Structure of this order is insufficient to derive a legal proposition. It is a dismissal for want of presentation, not a substantive determination of the Applicant's claim. No law is applied or discussed.
Case dismissed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 17.08.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II T.O.A. No.10 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. | |||
| rst – 32 | Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar dated 27.07.2026 shows that no representation was made by the parties. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, T.O.A. No.10 of 2023 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
