Disposed
Diwakar v. Shetty v Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/538/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
Issue for consideration
Whether applicants' pending applications should be disposed of in light of Respondent Bank's undertaking to withdraw auction and possession proceedings and withdraw the notice.
¶1
| 17.08.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.538 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Charles De Souza (through VC), Advocate for the Applicant. Ms Richa Shukla i/b M/s. Optimus Legal, Advocate for Respondent. |
|||
| rst - 11 | During the hearing, Ld. Advocate for Respondent submits that the Applicant has deposited the entire overdue amount and Respondent Bank is not going to conduct auction which is schedule today itself i.e., 17.08.2026 and not going to take possession which is scheduled on 22.08.2026. Ld. Advocate for Respondent further submits that Respondent Bank is withdrawing the 13(2) notice dated 03.03.2023. So, in the light of submission made by Ld. Advocate for Respondent, I.A. No.2100 of 2026 and I.A. No.2101 of 2026 as well as S.A. No.538 of 2025 stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether applicants' pending applications should be disposed of in light of Respondent Bank's undertaking to withdraw auction and possession proceedings and withdraw the notice.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Mr Charles De Souza
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Coram
AI extract
P.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court