Vats Gupta v. Bank of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the applicant as it was not pressed by the counsel before the court on 08.01.2026.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL
LUCKNOW
| Dateoforderor proceeding |
Order with signature of court | Officeaction takenwith date |
|---|---|---|
| SANo.914/22. 08.01.2026 SI No.20 |
Sh. Sarvesh Tiwari Ld counsel forthe applicantis present. Sh. PraveenDwivediLd counselfor the respondent bank ispresent. Ld counsel for the applicantsubmitted thathe doesnot wanttopressthe SAand may be disposedof. Since, applicant is not interestedto press the S.A., therefore, SA is dismissed being not pressed. The SAisdisposedofaccordingly. Record beconsignedtorecordroom. Pending1.A.ifany, also disposedoff. OrderbeuploadedontheTribunal’s website Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s website. (Dictated) ra (PravasKun,drS-lngh) PresidingOfficer (Manoj) |
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sh. Sarvesh Tiwari
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Coram
Manoj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court