Dismissed
M S Sana Rice Mill v. State Bank of India
DRTSA/466/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Dateoforderor proceeding |
Order with signature of court | Officeaction takenwith date |
|---|---|---|
| SANo.466/24. 08.01.2026 SINo.18 |
BH of Ldcounselfortheapplicantis present. Ld counsel for the respondent bankis present. Ld counselforthe applicantsubmitted that account has been settled andclosed Since the account has beensettled and no cause of action survives in this S.A.,thereforetheSAisdisposedofbeing infructuous Accordingly,the S.A. isdisposedof being infructuous. Record be consigned to record room. Pending I.A.ifany, also disposedoff. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s website. (Dictated) (PravasKumbrSi'ngh) PresidingOfficer (Manoj) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Coram
AI extract
PrasvabhRam Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court