M S Apex Enterprises v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
In S.A.No.4/2022, the Bench disposed of a Securitization Application because the respondent bank submitted that the claim had been settled and closed.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date oforder or proceeding |
Order with signature of court | Officeaction taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.4/2022 08.01.2026 SL.No.34 |
Ld. Counsels for all the parties are present. Ld.Counselfor therespondent bank submits that in this casel account hasbeen & settledand closed. In view of the fact, the present Securitization Application is disposed off as wKhdrawan.b''-1~~'.d~"Wc+~'”''” rl Let the file be consigned torecord room. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s website. (Dictated) (Pravas Kum,'',gh) PresidingOfficer |
|
| (Mugish) |
Parties & counsel
- other
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
- respondent
Respondent bank
Coram
Pravas Kum
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court