Disposed
Rahul Harischandra Pawar v. Bank of India
DRTSA/471/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 05.06.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-III S.A. No.471 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms Preeti Bhalerao, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms Amrita Dutta, Advocate for the Respondent. |
|||
| Tjs- 1 | Applicant has filed Withdrawal Application (I.A. No.1032 of 2026) for withdrawal of the S.A. No.471 of 2025. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the account has been upgraded and matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the Applicant wants to withdraw the present S.A. In view of the submission made by the Ld. Advocate for the Applicant, I.A. No.1032 of 2026 is allowed. Resultantly, S.A. No.471 of 2025 stands disposed of as withdrawn. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- I/c P.O. DRT-III, Mumbai At: DRT-II, Mumbai |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Bank of Maharashtra versus ms tirupati agro chemicals
Mr Deepchand Purshottam Kesarwani versus Abhyudaya Cooperative Bank Limited
Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Limited versus Minita
Mr Lal Mohammad Ansari Borrower Through Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Mushtaque Ahmad Ansari versus Union Bank of India (Andhra Bank)