Disposed order where the applicant failed to appear or make representation. The single judge dismissed and disposed of Special Appeal No.178 of 2026 on the ground that the applicant was not interested in pursuing the case further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 29.05.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-III S.A. No.178 of 2026 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Ms Shobha Chavan, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. |
|||
| Tjs- 10 | Order-sheet maintained the dated 05.05.2026 shows that no representation was made by the Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.178 of 2026 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- I/c P.O. DRT-III, Mumbai At: DRT-II, Mumbai |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondent No.1
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
