tenant and in occupation of 1 BHK flat in fourth floor on a monthly rent of Rs.9000/-; Applicant No.3 is a tenant and in occupation of 1 BHK flat at 4th floor on a monthly rent of Rs.9000/-; Appiicant No.4 is a tenant and in occupation of 1 BHK in 4th floor on monthly rent of Rs. 10,000/- from Respondent NO.5 whereas Applicant No.5 is a tenant and in occupation of 2 BHK flat at 5th floor on a monthly rent of Rs.8000/- from Respondent No.2 more fully described in C schedule property under oral tenancy. Originally, Respondents No.2 to 5 being the owners and possessors of the schedule B property admeasuring 324.80 sq.yds., demolished two floor building in the year 2015 and constructed Ground plus 4 upper floors building with pent house. Thereafter, in furtherance to the transfer of the title/mutation of the land, fourth floor of the of house property was allotted to Respondent No.S. Thereafter, Applicants No.1 to 4 obtained flats in 4ft floor from Respondent No.S and Applicant No.S obtained flat in 5th floor from Respondent No.2. The Applicants are paying monthly rents to Respondents 2 & 5 without any default since last 8 years. Suddenly, some of the officials of lst Respondent aiong with advocate commissioner visited the schedule property and affixed Vacate Notice dt.O3.11.2023 pursuant to the orders of Ld.X ACMM, Secunderabad and directed to the Applicants to vacate the C schedule property and informed that Respondents No.2 to 5 mortgaged the B schedule property in security to the loan facilities avaiied by them from the 1"t Respondent. The B schedule property mortgaged by the Respondents No.2 to 5 and now the C schedule property, which, the Respondent No. 1 is proceeding u/s 14 of the SARFAESI Act,2002 are nor tallying with each other and so the said proceedings are not legal. Hence the SA.
