Disposed
Stallien Anthony Aditdravid v. Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/39/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 27.03.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.39 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr Bhavesh Poojari, Advocate for the Respondent. |
|||
| rst – 23 | Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar dated 23.12.2025 shows that no representation was made by the Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.39 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court