Disposed
Swarna Navin Salian v. Encore Arc Pvt. Ltd.
DRTSA/226/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 25.03.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.226 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Puneet Gogad and Mr Kushal Sawant, Advocates for the Applicant. Ms Richa Shukla i/b M/s. Optimus Legal, Advocates for Respondent. |
|||
| 26 | Ld. Advocate for the Applicant filed pursis (exhibit-26) for withdrawal of S.A. No.226 of 2022. |
||
| Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the matter has been fully and finally settled as the Applicant has paid the sum of Rs.1.10 crores vide settlement letter dated 18.03.2026 as “Exhibit-A” to which Ld. Advocate for Respondent has no objections. In the light of Puris (exhibit-26) filed, nothing survives in the present S.A. |
|||
| rst - 13 | Resultantly, S.A. No.226 of 2022 stands disposed of as withdrawn. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
AI extract
P.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court