Ranu Maniyar v. Asset Care and Reconstruction Enterprise Limited
DRTSA/250/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single judge order dismissing a special application due to absence of instructions from the applicant, resulting in the case being disposed of.
What did the court decide?
The special application No. 250 of 2023 was dismissed and disposed of.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| 27.03.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.250 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| rst – 19 | 12 | Mr Rishabh Shah (through VC) a/w Ms Mansi Thakkar i/b M/s. Raval Shah & Co., Advocates for the Applicant. Ms Dhrumi, Advocate for the Respondent. Ld. Advocate for the applicant has filed pursis (exhibit-12) and submits that the Ld. Advocate for the applicant has addressed through email dated 28.02.2026 and 06.03.2026 and seeking instructions regarding filing of withdrawal application, however, no response is given from their client. Ld. Advocate for the applicant submits that they have no instructions today from their clients. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.250 of 2023 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court