Mukesh Sharma v. Gic Housing Finance Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
DT(Jaipur) disposed of Securitization Application as withdrawn upon counsel's submission that the account was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 24
Case No. SA/318/2025
MUKESH SHARMA Vs GIC HOUSING FINANCE LTD SHARMA
Date: 20.03.2026. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Palash Gupta, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Ramnaresh Vijay, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that account stands closed and he prayed that the SA may be disposed of as withdrawn.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for SA applicant, this Securitization Application stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Mukesh Sharma
GIC Housing Finance Ltd
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court