The Securitization Application was dismissed because the possession notice dated 04.06.2025 issued by the respondent bank had already lapsed due to the current date being 19.03.2026, rendering the application time-barred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 29
Case No. SA/371/2025
REKHA TAHILIANI Vs HDFC BANK
Date: 19.03.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Vineet Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Shri Rahul Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent no. 3
This Securitization Application filed against the possession notice wherein the respondent bank has intimated that they will take possession on 04.06.2025 and the date has lapsed.
In view of the above, this Securitization Application stands dismissed. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
REKHA TAHILIANI
HDFC BANK
Respondent no. 3
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
