Disposed
Priyanka Siksha Samiti v. Central Bank of India
DRTRA/11/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 38
Case No.RA/11/2025 IN SA/762/2023
PRIYANKA SIKSHA SAMITI Vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
Date: 10.08.2026. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Ravi Kumar, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Ritin Jain, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, reply is still not filed. Counsel for the SA applicant, respondent in Review application, submits that he will file reply.
According to the bank, the account was regularized and not settled and closed. The orders need to be reviewed and instead of “that matter has been settled and account stands closed” following be read as part and parcel of the order “that matter has been settled and account stands regularized”
In view of the above, RA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
Priyanka Siksha Samiti
Central Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court