Drts Tribunal disposed of the applicant's Securitization Application as infructuous due to the closure of the account by the respondent bank and absence of the applicant.
The Securitization Application stood disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 20
Case No. SA/741/2025
KISHORE KHIALANI Vs A U SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Date: 06.08.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Smt. Surbhi Bairathi, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submitted that account stands closed and he prayed that the SA may be disposed of as infructuous.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank and also considering the fact that none appeared on behalf of the SA applicant, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Kishore Khialani
A U Small Finance Bank Limited
Vimal Gupta
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
