The applicant moved to withdraw an Original Application (OA) and have court fees returned. The court allowed the withdrawal, disposed of the OA as withdrawn, and returned all pending Interim Applications (IAs) if any.
OA disposed of as withdrawn; court fees returned; pending IAs disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 86
Case No.OA/983/2023
UNION BANK OF INDIA Vs CHAIN SINGH RAJPUROHIT @CHEN SINGH PUROHIT
Date: 19.02.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode:
Present:
Shri Ritesh Kalal, Counsel for the applicant
None for the defendants
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this OA and
also requested to return the court fee.
Request is allowed.
As the applicant wants to withdraw this OA, therefore OA stands disposed of as withdrawn. Court fees may be returned as per the rules. All pending IAs stands disposed of, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
Union Bank of India
Chain Singh Rajpurohit @Chen Singh Purohit
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
