The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur disposed of an Original Application sought to be withdrawn by the applicant bank, which submitted that the account was settled.
Refund of court fees directed to the registry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 99
Case No. OA/350/2024
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED Vs MADHU LAL JAT
Date: 08.06.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present: Ms. Vidisha Kaul, Counsel for the Applicant None for the Defendants
In this matter, Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank submits that account stands settled and she prayed for withdrawal of this Original Application and refund of court fee.
In view of the above submission, this Original Application stands disposed of. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
