The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the applicant's request to withdraw Special Appeal SA/1007/2025 as the dispute between the parties had been settled.
Special Appeal allowed as withdrawn due to settlement between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 35
Case No.SA/1007/2025
BASUDEO SHARMA Vs CLIX HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
Date: 05.06.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode:
Present:
Shri Hitesh Mishra, Counsel for the applicant
Ms. Surbhi Bairathi, Counsel for the Respondent
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, as the matter has been settled between the parties. Counsel for the respondent confirms the same.
Request is allowed.
As the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore SA stands disposed of as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
BASUDEO SHARMA
CLIX HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
