Disposed
Union Bank of India v. Sitaram
DRTOA/290/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 23.04.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A. No.290 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Navin Arora (through VC) a/w. Ms Pranjal, Advocates for the Applicant. None for Defendants. |
|||
| su -14 | 16 | Ld. Advocate for the applicant has filed I.A. No.1120 of 2026 for withdrawal of the O.A. supported by affidavit (exhibit-16). Ld. Advocate for the applicant submits that the matter has been amicably settled with the defendants as the borrower has made all the pending dues. Now, the applicant does not wish to pursue with this O.A. In light of the statement made by Ld. Advocate for the applicant, I.A. No.1120 of 2026 for withdrawal of the O.A. is allowed. Resultantly, withdrawal of O.A. No.290 of 2024 is also permitted. The Applicant shall be entitled to refund of court fees as per Rules. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Defendants
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court