The court allowed the withdrawal application of the applicant. Consequently, the present special application (M.A. No.23 of 2024) was disposed of as withdrawn amid amicable settlement between parties.
Withdrawal application allowed; S.A. No.23 of 2024 disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 27.03.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II M.A. No.23 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms Neetu Prajapati (through VC) i/b Mr Dinesh Kumar Dubey, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr Krishna Jaiwar i/b Mr R.L. Motwani, Advocate for Respondent. |
|||
| The Applicant has filed Withdrawal Application (I.A. No.2880 of 2025) for withdrawal of the M.A. No.23 of 2024. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant the Applicant does not want to proceed with this M.A. Hence, seeks for withdrawal of the present M.A. Ld. Advocate for the applicant submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the Applicant wants to withdraw the present S.A. In view of the submission made by the Ld. Advocate for the Applicant, I.A. No.2880 of 2025 is allowed. Resultantly, M.A. No.23 of 2024 stands disposed of as withdrawn. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed |
Page 1 of 2
| of. | ||
|---|---|---|
| File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. |
||
| Closed | ||
| P.O. | ||
| rst - 12 | DRT-II |
Page 2 of 2
Ms Neetu Prajapati
Mr Krishna Jaiwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
