Bank of Baroda v. Saroj
Case brief
What is this about?
Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed a miscellaneous application filed by a bank to restore an inadvertently withdrawn original application due to counsel's error, enabling the matter to proceed as if never withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Miscellaneous Application allowed and Original Application 1017/2025 restored to its original position.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Supp. Item No.01
Case No. MA/17/2026 IN OA/1017/2025
BANK OF BARODA Vs SAROJ
Date: 16.01.2026
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Shubham Choudhary, Counsel for the applicant
This Misc. Application has been filed by the bank in OA no. 1017/2025 and counsel for the applicant submits that inadvertently the said proceedings were withdrawn though the matter was not settled or closed.
For the mistake of the counsel, the bank should not suffer, therefore, this Misc. Application stands allowed. Original Application 1017/2025 stands restored to its original position.
Accordingly, Misc. application stands disposed of as allowed. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant bank should be permitted to restore a withdrawal caused by an inadvertent mistake of counsel when there was no settlement.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
BANK OF BARODA
- respondent
SAROJ
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court