The Tribunal dismissed the matter due to a total absence of the applicant and no representation. The document contains no substantive legal reasoning or decision on merits. No citation is provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 09.10.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II T.O.A. No.122 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. | |||
| nrb – 26 | No representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through Advocate or through VC. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, T.O.A. No.122 of 2023 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
