The Single Judge dismissed Special Appeal No.99 of 2023 for want of prosecution after the applicant remained absent from the hearing on 31.01.2025, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Special Appeal No.99 of 2023 dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 31.01.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.99 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Both parties absent. | |||
| Case called out but there is no response from either of the parties. It is apparent from the record that since 09.02.2024, the Applicant remained absent in the matter. It appears from the conduct of the Applicant that he is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.99 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. |
|||
| rst - 10 | Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Special Appeal No.99 of 2023 proceeds in the face of applicant's absence since 09.02.2024.
Applicant
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
