S.A. No. 101 of 2023 was set aside for want of prosecution. The application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's continuous absence since 13.08.2024, this court noting his lack of interest in pursuing the matter further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 31.01.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.101 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr Subir Kumar a/w Ms Vaishnavi Pawar i/b M/s. SDS Advocates, for Respondent. |
|||
| Case called out but there is no response from either of the parties. It is apparent from the record that since 13.08.2024, the Applicant remained absent in the matter. It appears from the conduct of the Applicant that he is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.101 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. |
|||
| rst - 17 | Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
