The Bank's withdrawal application was allowed after a settlement of Rs. 6,52,436 was arrived at with the Defendants. The open petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with a refund of court fee.
Withdrawal of the open petition allowed. Refund of court fee ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 30.01.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A. No.285 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| nrb -36 | 8 | Ms Tamil Selvi Laxman, Advocate for the Applicant. None for Defendant. Applicant Bank has filed Withdrawal Application I.A. No.36 of 2025 supported by affidavit (exhibit-8) for withdrawal of the O.A. No.285 of 2024. Pursuant to settlement arrived at with Defendants and having received Rs.6,52,436/- towards full and final settlement of the Claim under O.A., Applicant Bank moved an Interlocutory Application (I.A.) No.36 of 2025 seeking withdrawal of the O.A. which is allowed and O.A. No.285 of 2024 stands disposed of as withdrawn. This Tribunal orders refund of court fee as per Rules. Pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Withdrawal Application is allowed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Applicant Bank
Defendant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
